National Council on Strength & Fitness
 
Shopping Basket0 item(s) $0.00
Setting Standards, Developing Professionals, and Serving the Public through Education and Certification
 
Stay Connnected
 
 
 
 

NCSF Community

 
 
Warning labels on sugary drinks heading towards passage
 
Date:May 14 2014
Capital Hill
 
 

The most recent move by lawmakers directed at encouraging Americans to drink less soda and sweetened beverages has passed its first legislative hurdle. On April 9th, the Senate Committee on Health passed a California bill that would require sugary drinks to carry warning labels regarding the possible harmful effects associated with consuming these beverages. The warning label would apply to drinks containing 75 calories or more per 12-ounce serving, and would read: "STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay."

This bill is not the first attempt at influencing consumers drink choices. The bill’s author, Senator Bill Monning, unsuccessfully backed a measure to tax sugary beverages and soft drinks last year. In 2012, then-New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg led a citywide ban on the sales of oversized soft drinks, which was deemed illegal by a state judge after legal challenges by soft drink makers and restaurant groups. Not surprisingly, this labeling bill is meeting fierce opposition from the U.S. food and beverage industry. A representative from the California Nevada Soft Drink Association said that while the bill may be well-intentioned, it "will do nothing to prevent obesity, diabetes or tooth decay, and may even make problems worse."

California, which banned sodas and junk food from public schools in 2005, is already at the forefront of a growing national movement to reduce the consumption of high-calorie beverages. If enacted, this legislation would help to educate consumers about the dangers of consuming excess sugar without requiring more controversial measures like bans and taxes.

The bill now heads to the Senate Committee on Appropriations.

 
 
 
 
 
Facebook
twitter
twitter
 
You Tube
 
 
YouTube Loading...
 
 
 
NCSF Personal Trainer Blog
  Date:  Aug 4 2015
 
 
One of the many challenges facing any professional is finding an enjoyable job while getting paid the money they want or perceive to deserve. Many people go to work every day, enjoy what they do, but would like to be paid more often feeling they deserve more money for the time they spend performing daily tasks and responsibilities. But if a person goes to the same job, performs the same or similar tasks, which end up generating the same money for the business or company there exists an economic conundrum; there is no additional increase in revenues to justify an increase in pay. Regardless of how well the tasks or responsibilities are completed, if a position does not increase the money coming in to the company, then an increase in money going out towards the position is not justified. This brings up the point that some positions function as an asset with negative implications or financial liability, whereas other roles can be viewed as positive assets due to their income generating potential.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Upcoming Workshops
Certification Exam Locator
Credential Verification
Request an Info Brochure
 
 
 
 
Need Help? Our team is ready to assist: 1 800 772 NCSF(6273)
NCSF Certified Personal Trainer
NCCA Accredited Program